Step 1 — Submission
Authors submit their manuscript with the required metadata, including title, abstract, keywords, article type, and manuscript file.
From Submission to Publication
Editorial Workflow
The journal follows a structured editorial process to ensure scientific quality, review consistency, and publication integrity.
Step 2 — Editorial Screening
The editorial office evaluates the submission for scope, basic quality, formatting completeness, and ethical suitability.
Step 3 — Peer Review
Eligible manuscripts are sent for expert review. Reviewers assess relevance, originality, methodological quality, and clarity.
Step 4 — Decision
Based on editorial judgment and reviewer input, the manuscript may be accepted, returned for revision, or declined.
Step 5 — Revision
Where applicable, authors revise the manuscript and resubmit a corrected version responding to editorial or reviewer comments.
Step 6 — Publication
Accepted manuscripts are prepared for publication with article metadata, issue assignment, and final public display.
General Principles
- Scientific merit remains central to editorial assessment.
- Editorial handling and peer review are conducted with professionalism and confidentiality.
- Publication decisions reflect quality, scope relevance, and ethical compliance.