IJAISE

Editorial Workflow

The International Journal of AI, Science and Engineering (IJAISE) follows a structured editorial workflow designed to ensure fairness, scientific quality, editorial transparency, and timely communication with authors.

Overview of the Process

Each manuscript submitted to IJAISE passes through a sequence of editorial and scientific evaluation stages before a final publication decision is made. The workflow is intended to support academic rigor while offering a clear and professional experience for authors, reviewers, and editors.

1. Submission

Authors submit their manuscript through the journal submission page or through the official editorial contact channels provided by the journal.

  • Author information is recorded
  • Manuscript metadata is collected
  • Uploaded files are stored for editorial processing

2. Initial Editorial Screening

The editorial team performs a preliminary review to determine whether the submission fits the aims, scope, and minimum quality requirements of IJAISE.

  • Scope relevance check
  • Basic formatting and completeness review
  • Language clarity and general presentation
  • Initial ethical and originality attention

3. Peer Review Stage

Manuscripts that pass editorial screening may be assigned for peer review. Reviewers evaluate the scientific merit, originality, methodology, clarity, and contribution of the work.

  • Selection of suitable reviewers
  • Confidential evaluation process
  • Academic comments and recommendations
  • Possible request for revisions

4. Author Revision

When revisions are requested, authors are invited to update their manuscript in response to editorial and reviewer comments.

  • Minor revision
  • Major revision
  • Clarification of methods, results, or structure
  • Resubmission for editorial reassessment

5. Final Editorial Decision

After review and revision, the editorial board makes a final decision based on the academic quality and readiness of the manuscript.

  • Accept
  • Accept with minor adjustments
  • Request further revision
  • Reject

6. Publication Preparation

Accepted manuscripts are prepared for publication in the appropriate volume and issue of the journal.

  • Final metadata validation
  • Issue and volume assignment
  • Archiving and presentation on the journal website
  • Inclusion in the publication record

Typical Status Flow

Status Meaning
Submitted The manuscript has been received by the journal.
Under Editorial Screening The editorial team is checking scope, format, and general suitability.
Under Review The manuscript is being evaluated by reviewers.
Revision Requested The authors are invited to revise and improve the manuscript.
Accepted The manuscript has been approved for publication.
Rejected The manuscript has not been accepted for publication.
Published The article has been assigned to a volume/issue and published.

Editorial Commitments

  • Fair and independent editorial assessment
  • Respect for confidentiality and academic ethics
  • Constructive communication with authors
  • Progressive strengthening of journal quality standards

For Authors

Authors are encouraged to submit well-prepared manuscripts that respect the journal’s scope, ethics policy, and instructions for authors. A clear and complete submission helps facilitate the editorial process and improves evaluation efficiency.